
Francesca's Discourse Blog (Arch.Y1)
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
*SEMIFINALS*

Friday, June 25, 2010
London Summer Days

Wednesday, June 23, 2010
power of life, power of word
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
...To Be Continued...
In Medio Stat Virtus, In Medio Stat Veritas
I believe in balance, but not the balance made out of 50% black and 50% white. I think balance is more personal, deeper, relative and subjective.
What I mean with balance is taking the best from both sides, what you prefer from both or more parts, and making them your ones, personalizing them.
There are some things, which I think are very few, that are completely one way or the other one, and usually there is no doubt about them. Maybe one day there will be, but at the present moment, that is the way there are and it is not yet changeable or discussable.
But most things in life, I believe have different levels, opinions, options, choices.
I believe variety and the capability of changing are among the nicest and most fascinating things of human beings.
‘ISMS’: Frank Lloyd Wright, Guggenheim New York
Definitely it seems like a building, which has put into second place functionality as a museum, and in first place esthetic, shape and eye-catching clean elements.
If you have ever had the chance to visit it, it isn’t maybe the most comfortable museum to go around, it is not as clear as maybe the architect thought it would.
But I would also like to say that maybe we don’t understand his concept very well, maybe he did think about functionality, but he didn’t realize that the way he interpreted functionality maybe was just to personal and not applicable enough for the rest of society.
And seriously, I do believe an architect must have his ‘foot print’, his personality and thoughts, but has also to think about the clients: the private client, that is going to finance the construction, and in this case Guggenheim, but also, ‘cause it is somehow a sort of public building or at least is meant to be for other people too, the architect in this case has to think about who is going to be using this spaces.
I believe architecture is not only about ‘you’ but also, and mainly, about others.
And I think that it is a pity somehow, that Lloyds Masterpiece, amazingly felt, nit, pure and cleaver, which I personally really like, seems not to have worked out as they imagined it would.
But still, I am going to attach a Piece about it I have read, that might change a bit our minds, or at least, make us be a little less drastic about judging him and his work, because he did think about us, people and society, just maybe had to many expectation about human being.
‘’To the question of why did he prefer a ramp to conventional floors, Wright answered that for a museum visitor is nicer to enter a building, go up with the elevator until the highest floor, and slowly descend – having always the chance to go up and down with the elevator again- to, finally, find the end of the exhibition in the ground floor, next to the exit. Wright added that in the majority of conventional museums, people had to cross large exhibition spaces, to go through them again and again when ending their visit, just to get to the exit.
Guggenheim was enthusiastic about the upward spiral and supported the project until his death in 1949.
When Lloyd died in April 1959, the construction was almost complete, and only some last remaining details had to be finished. The 21st October, the museum opened its doors to the public.
During the construction process, the director and the administrators of the museum, received a letter signed from a long list of artists, in which they exposed that the slightly bent walls and the ramp weren’t appropriate for a painting exposition. ‘ Why do you think the walls of the Salomon R. Guggenheim Museum are slightly bent towards the exterior? Because its founder and architect thought that paintings located on a slightly bent wall can be looked at with a better perspective and receive lighting better than if they were absolutely vertically hanged up.
This is the main principal of our building, the hypothesis on which the project was based on. It is a new idea, but it can become a very important precedent in and for the future’. “